ArtaA Compendium of the Achaemenid World
Concept

The Drauga (the Lie)

also: drauga · drauj · druj · the Lie · the Falsehood

The Iranian principle of falsehood and disorder, the cosmic and political adversary of arta (Truth); in Darius's Behistun inscription, the force embodied by every rebel and pretender against the rightful king.

The drauga (Avestan druj) is the Lie: not only the spoken untruth but the whole principle of falsehood, deceit, and disorder that stands against arta, the right order of the world. In Iranian religious thought it is the adversary that the Wise Lord's creation must overcome; in Achaemenid royal ideology it is the charge levelled at every enemy of the king.

Darius's inscription at Behistun is the great political deployment of the idea. The pretenders who rose against him — Gaumāta the Magus who claimed to be the dead Bardiya, and the string of rebel 'kings' in Elam, Babylon, Media, and the east — are each said to have lied: 'he lied; thus he said: I am Bardiya son of Cyrus.' The provinces that rebelled 'became faithless'; the Lie 'made them rebellious'. Darius closes with a warning to future kings and readers: guard strongly against the Lie; the man who is a lie-follower, punish him well. The rhetoric is total and self-serving — to be Darius's opponent is, by definition, to be a servant of the drauga — but it is also sincere ideology: the king's legitimacy rests on his being the one man on the side of the Truth.

The drauga therefore does double work in the sources: it is a genuine religious-ethical category (the Persians' horror of the lie, reported independently by Herodotus) and a propaganda instrument (the delegitimising of all rivals). The two cannot be neatly separated, which is part of what makes Behistun such a rich and such a treacherous document.

How we know

Because the Lie is the organising accusation of Behistun — the one surviving long first-person account of how an Achaemenid took the throne — it is impossible to read the political history of Darius's accession without reading his theology. Modern historians treat the 'all my enemies lied' framing with deep caution; some even suspect Darius himself was the usurper and Gaumāta/Bardiya the wronged party, which would make the Lie-charge the boldest lie of all.

References

Citation tiers: primary verifiable primary evidence · secondary a specific verified modern reference · consensus (flagged) a represented scholarly position, honestly flagged, not a fabricated citation.

  1. primary Behistun (DB) §§10–11, 52, 54, 63–67 — the pretenders 'lied'; the warning against the Lie
  2. primary DNb §8 — the doer of the Lie is not befriended; is punished
  3. primary Herodotus 1.138 — lying the greatest Persian disgrace
  4. consensus (flagged) On the modern suspicion that Darius, not Gaumāta, was the usurper — a live scholarly minority position; upgrade with specific references when checked

Cite this entry

“The Drauga (the Lie)”, in Arta: A Compendium of the Achaemenid World (entry the-drauga), accessed 2026.

Arta (Truth, right order) · Ahura Mazdā · The Behistun Inscription (DB) · Darius I · Religion & the Lie: the Achaemenid religious world